Nintendo is currently seeking a subpoena from a California court that, if successful, would compel Discord to disclose the personal details of the individual behind the significant Pokemon leak known as the "FreakLeak" or "TeraLeak." This leak, which surfaced last year, has prompted Nintendo to take legal action to uncover the identity of the person responsible.
According to court documents reviewed and reported by Polygon, Nintendo is asking the court to mandate Discord to reveal the name, address, phone number, and email address of a user identified as "GameFreakOUT." In October of last year, GameFreakOUT allegedly shared copyrighted material, including artwork, characters, source code, and other Pokemon-related content, on a Discord server named "FreakLeak." This content subsequently spread widely across the internet.
Although not officially confirmed, the leaked materials are believed to have originated from a data breach that Game Freak disclosed in August, which was revealed to the public in October. Game Freak reported that the breach compromised the personal information of 2,606 current, former, and contract employees. Interestingly, the leaked files appeared online on October 12, and Game Freak's statement was released the following day, albeit backdated to October 10. The statement did not mention any confidential company materials beyond employee data.
The materials leaked included details about numerous unannounced projects, cut content, background information, and early builds of various Pokemon games. One notable revelation was the upcoming battle-focused game, Pokemon Champions, which was unveiled before its official announcement in February. The leak also contained accurate information about Pokemon Legends: Z-A, as well as unverified details about the next generation of Pokemon, source code for DS Pokemon titles, meeting summaries, and cut lore from Pokemon Legends: Arceus and other games.
While Nintendo has not yet initiated a lawsuit against any hacker or leaker, the subpoena suggests a strong intent to identify the individual responsible. Given Nintendo's history of aggressively pursuing legal action against piracy and patent infringement, it seems likely that they will proceed further if the subpoena is granted.